We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by law." It's nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
In the event the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by both party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and commence according to the regulation. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
The ruling with the first court created case law that must be followed by other courts until eventually or Until both new law is created, or perhaps a higher court rules differently.
Unfortunately, that was not real. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son explained to his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two days later, and admitted to obtaining sexually molested the pair’s son several times.
Just a couple years in the past, searching for case precedent was a tough and time consuming job, necessitating folks to search through print copies of case law, or to buy access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a number of case regulation search opportunities, and lots of sources offer free access to case regulation.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically bring on exoneration from departmental charges based over the same factual grounds. While a writ under Article 199 is obtainable in specific limited situations, it is actually generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-look at witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't influence the department of his/her innocence.
However it's made obvious that police is free to choose action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities topic to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused to your petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also make sure respect on the family get rid of in accordance with regulation and if they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they're able to act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate as being a issue of security in the house is concerned, which will not be public place under the Act 1977. nine. Considering the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition continues to be attained. For that reason, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated higher than. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads forty Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Some bodies are specified statutory powers to issue direction with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, like the Highway Code.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mold the relief to really make it correct into the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified from the decision in the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim get more info Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated higher than. However no harassment shall be caused to both party and also the case shall be decided through the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe like a foster child. Although the couple experienced two youthful children of their own at home, the social worker didn't inform them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report towards the court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement in the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the pair experienced younger children.
As being the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be achieved, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, It is usually a perfectly-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.